Reply to I Live Comfortably on Less than $70K After-Tax in DC Area

Forum Index » Money and Finances

Reply to "I Live Comfortably on Less than $70K After-Tax in DC Area"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][b]Sorry, OP, no one ever said (again) bring single on 100k gross or 70k net was hard[/b]. I did well with a net of 30k here when I was single.

But it is a completely different ball game when kids are in the picture. You want net dollars. My over 200k salary nets me around 130k. From there I have to pay health insurance out of pocket, child care, housing,  groceries, etc. I also had to buy a new car when my second was born so I now have car payments again. It's a big difference now, and yes, it's not easy.[/quote]

Honestly there have been threads where people have put down those making 100k (single people)....   But no its not hard to live on that amount -- because I have as well.[/quote]
Agree. There was a thread where people were telling an older single woman that she was a loser because she earned only $100,000. Called her a failure and even said she almost qualified for welfare. [/quote]

I don't think that's a majority DCUM position.  [/quote]

I agree.  And if it were true, there'd be no problem citing multiple positions and posts with links that state such.  I haven't seen it.

I think that the OP started by saying that it's easy to live on $70k, and then when people said "That's because you're single!" OP backed into the position that DCUM paints people who make $100k as poor and are barely getting by when that's not exactly the case.  [/quote]

Just a couple posts above you is someone making the claim that "it's hard to raise kids in this area on $300k (two government lawyer salaries) or less."  I think there's another thread on the front page that makes a similar claim -- that $300k HHI is not a lot in this area.  I think we're kidding ourselves if we pretend that there isn't a very vocal and active contingent of DCUM believes that $100k is poor.  (I have no way of knowing whether these posters are a majority of DCUM, but they are active and visible.)[/quote]
Yes, exactly. You can't on one hand say that $100,000 for a single is lots of money, and then on the other hand say that it's hard to get by on $300,000 once you add a couple of kids into the picture.

There's a big disconnect going on here. If $100k is good money for a single (I believe it is), then $300k is good money for a family. It doesn't take an extra $130,000 (after-tax additional income between $100k and $300k) to raise a family. That's more than $10,000 ADDITIONAL PER MONTH![/quote]

It's hard to save as much as you need to if you have kids who you want to send to private college some day. [b]To send my three children to a school that costs 70k right now ([/b]as our alma mater does), we have to save $45k a year. Just for college. Then you have retirement to worry about, which is supposed to be your #1 priority. Then your mortgage so they can go to a good school so they can [i]get into[/i] that college your saving a small fortune for. If they're little, don't forget that your looking at several thousand dollars a month for daycare. Maybe you have student loans of your own that you're still paying back.

Then when your kids are older, you have to pay for wrap around care at school and their activities which very often are not cheap. If you work, you need to pay someone to drive them to said activities. Of course people are going to come in and say "activities are not necessary." Well I disagree. I think it's important for kids to be engaged in their community and to have hobbies outside of school that they care about. Plus, they *are* necessary to get into those colleges you're saving a small fortune for. What's the point of saving that much money if they're not even going to have a shot at getting in? So you do have to play the game and jump through those hoops.

It adds up and doesn't leave a lot left over for the nice things that rich people are supposed to have (nice cars, luxurious vacations, country club memberships, etc.).[/quote]

See -- the $70k college is not a choice for us - it's going to be state school.   YOU are making that choice and you are wealthy if you can even consider it.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics