Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This is the statement of facts with Lively's reply: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.1236.2.pdf Wayfarer wrote: 64. Footage of the birthing scene shows Lively covered with a hospital gown and a prosthetic pregnancy belly. Ex. 74, WAYFARER_000140494 Lively wrote: 26 Plaintiff’s Response 64: Disputed as incomplete and misleading. While certain footage of the birthing scene shows Lively wearing a hospital gown and a prosthetic pregnancy belly, production blocked and filmed the scene over several hours using multiple framings and angles, including angles that depicted Lively’s side profile fully nude from the chest down. To obtain those shots, the hospital gown was positioned only to cover her breasts, with an exposed prosthetic belly and a small, thin piece of flat black fabric covering her genital area. During filming, Lively lay on her back with her legs placed in stirrups while a male actor—whom she later learned was a personal friend of Baldoni—stood positioned between her legs for the scene. Accordingly, the cited footage does not fully or accurately reflect the partial nudity, nudity– simulating blocking, and filming that occurred. Exs. 16; 13, Baker Tr. 209:20–210:14; 14, Talbot Tr. 69:13–21, 86:7–16, 143:13–25, 145:16-146:17; Lively Decl. ¶¶ 14–15; see also Wayfarer Ex. 91, at Resp. 23 [/quote] A small thin black fabric otherwise known as underwear. If one is trying to make someone look nude, you put them in nude fabric not black. Blame explicitly claimed nude fabric until photographic evidence was revealed. [/quote] No, it's a strip of fabric that covers the genitals only, not underwear, because it exposes the "high hip line" form of nudity or semi-nudity. It's implied nudity. [/quote] Her high hip line is cover by a prosthetic belly, moron.[/quote] DP but weird to call someone a moron while claiming a belly covers one's hip. If you don't understand basic anatomy, maybe this conversation is not for you.[/quote] It’s her black briefs, then her fake belly hanging over. Pretty clear in the picture for those of us not allergic to reality.[/quote] WHAT PICTURE? Someone posted a video upthread that clearly shows her in a nude modesty panel (not briefs). You keep referencing a picture. Is some AI photo someone over on r/itendswithlawsuits cooked up? Link to actual evidence on the record or stop talking about it. The actual video evidence produced so far does not show that.[/quote] There already is a photo linked where she is wearing black bikini. Also, she ADMITS she was wearing black. [/quote] No, what was linked was a comment thread on r/itendswithlawsuits with a GIF of a photograb of a still of the video. And it still doesn't show "black briefs" or a "black bikini." But even if it did, that's not a piece of evidence. None of you even understand the signficance here -- she was in a modesty panel. Do you know why modesty panels were created? As a way to preserve actor modesty *while filming nude scenes*. Hmm....[/quote] No one films nude scenes in the black briefs baby. Or black modesty panels or anything black. But Blake SAYs she was wearing black.[/quote] How has this black underwear debate gone on so long? Blake was wearing black underwear. Her attorneys described it as a thin piece of fabric b/c they play fast and loose with the truth. Just like Vanzan was a “lawful” subpoena. The image is not explicit. If it was, the judge would not have released it to the public, which should tell you something. Blake is a grown adult. She could’ve said I want longer briefs or modesty shorts. She was a steamroller on that set but all of a sudden in the birthing scene she’s a damsel in distress. Not buying it. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics