Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Schools and Education General Discussion
Reply to "PARCC monitoring student's social media, wants schools to "punish" them"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote]Anonymous wrote: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2014/05/02/6-reasons-to-reject-common-core-k-3-standards-and-6-axioms-to-guide-policy/ Paper which includes information from studies on early childhood development and why the CC standards are inappropriate for early childhood grades. If we mess up the foundation, the structure may topple.[/quote] Great article! It is clear that the writers should have started with how children learn and not how they can test them. It is clear that they were seeking standards that they can measure through testing. This is probably not possible at such a young age and they will have to accept that fact. Obviously they don't want to accept that. Children at those ages develop in vastly different ways and that has to be accepted as a fact of how humans develop. After reading this I am totally in agreement with the woman on here who says that the developmental aspects of early children were not considered when writing the standards. I am not an early childhood educator, but I can see how this problem occurred. It needs to be rectified or the standards will not work for the most important grades! If we mess up in those grades, holy cow. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics