Reply to Donnie Dumptruck says Mar-A-Lago's been searched by the FBI

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Donnie Dumptruck says Mar-A-Lago's been searched by the FBI"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][twitter]https://twitter.com/timobrien/status/1563854804887261184?s=21&t=FcwVTj72VKWb4z-44iE9mg[/twitter][/quote]
It just gets worse and worse and worse![/quote]

The Post buried the mother-of-all-ledes. A reasonable inference would be that Stephanie Grisham has testified before the DC grand jury about the manner in which DJT handled classified information and more specifically how it was handled during trips abroad. The information attributed to her puts this right over the target zone. In other words, the ongoing GJ investigation isn’t limited to how documents were stored in an unsecured basement at MAL or whether they’re presidential records belonging to NARA. It’s ultimately about what Trump was doing with these documents whether in the private residence or during travel abroad. Who was he sharing the information with? And for what purpose? This dovetails with arguments about “declassification” advanced by Kash Patel and the MAGA disinfo army upon removal from the West Wing in an attempt to confuse and reframe the issue — that is, Trump did nothing illegal if he shared classified documents and it was just a matter of time before Kash and John Solomon released all of it. They doth protest too much. Trump isn’t going to sweat being caught with some classified documents in his possession. It’s not in his nature. And it’s not what he learned from Roy Cohn. It doesn’t warrant as much smoke — and shiftiing narratives — as the disinformation machine is producing in near panic mode.

Trump is desperate to find out in greater detail what materials were siezed by the FBI because he alone knows what he did with the information (or what the likes of Jared, Manafort, Flynn, Tom Barrack, Roger Stone or Solomon may have done with it). Did Trump prepare a second pardon for Stone? If so why was it siezed? Did it relate to a ratf8cking op on Macron? Trump did not make that many international trips.

This dovetails with the cited predicate for the warrant under 793(e) (Espionage Act) and 1519 (obstruction). It’s another reason the GJ was used to issue subpoenas for the MAL surveillance footage characterized in reports as capturing people removing and replacing boxes. As has been obvious for the past three weeks this is plainly about more than a failure to turn over presidential records even if that was the genesis of the investigation.

The icing on the cake? Bobb and Corcoran are each witnesses to a possible obstruction charge if not directly implicated as an accessory. It was Bobb who put herself in Giuliani’s warroom at the Willard on 1/5 with rest of the extras from Star Wars bar scene. My money is on complicit. [/quote]

OK now explain it in simple words my non-lawyer, non-DC brain can understand.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics