Reply to Big GDS news

Forum Index » Private & Independent Schools

Reply to "Big GDS news"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The way to figure it out in the big city is to ensure that added density pays for the external costs and impacts it adds.  In other words, more off-street parking spots, not fewer.  More aggressive traffic calming like they do it in MD to keep added traffic on the main roads and not the neighborhood streets.  It's common sense.  [/quote]

If you really want to cut down on traffic and parking problems, then DC should either stop providing second and third parking stickers to a single household, our charge a couple thousand for each additional sticker.  I don't understand why someone who buys some sorry house in Tenleytown should get as many free on street parking spaces as they want , and put the kids in Janney. But then complain that someone in an apartment should only take the metro and shouldn't have their kids in Janney. [/quote]

The point is not that someone in an apartment should not have a residential parking sticker.  People who live in multifamily buildings get access to RPP (unless more recently the developer has covenanted otherwise).  [b]The point is that new housing developments, particularly of a certain scale, shouldn't make an existing problem worse.[/b]  In economic terms, think of it as mitigating externalities -- the costs that otherwise burden the public, the concentrated new parking demand as potentially hundreds of occupants of new units in a given block may seek street parking.  (To be fair, I would also limit the number of RPPs for new single family construction where there is not offstreet parking.)  To address parking impacts, developers should be providing an adequate number of offstreet parking spots for residents and their visitors.  Lately, however, developers have gone to planning agencies and zoning boards to argue that residents will not be drivers and instead will take Uber and mass transit.   Projects that get relief from offstreet parking regs, as paltry as they've now become, should not be eligible for RPP.  This is exactly the approach that Arlington County takes.  In DC it has happened on a negotiated basis, but no agency wants to enforce it.  [/quote]

But what is the existing problem? I can get a parking spot in Tenleytown any time of day or night, within a block of the metro. This is a totaly fallacy that parking in Tenley is like Adams Morgan or some such.[/quote
]

This.  I've yet to see the parking problem.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics