Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Schools and Education General Discussion
Reply to "PARCC monitoring student's social media, wants schools to "punish" them"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote] I have actual evidence. You do not. [/quote] You really do not understand the difference between an "expert" who taught in a classroom for three years many years ago and a teacher who is required to use the standards? Really? You think that pointing that out is discrediting that person? My argument is that there were almost no classroom teachers on the committee. It is a valid argument. Not once have you proved it wrong. There were 135 members. It does not trouble you at all that there were not any early childhood teachers on the committees? Not one? It does not trouble you that there were less than five elementary teachers? Maybe, only three? And, no, teaching twenty years ago is not the same as using the standards in the classroom today. Much of the experience that you tout was prior to NCLB. These teachers have never had the pressure of testing along with the standards. Do you really not get that? I would have no problem with these "experts" if they were balanced by real world teachers. The committees were not balanced. You can look at the lists and figure that out. [/quote] It doesn't particularly trouble me given that Common Core Elementary math standards align pretty extensively with most state SOLs for Elementary. Just because you think the process was flawed doesn't mean the product is flawed. A.) It's only your opinion that the process was flawed, and you've willfully ignored all of the information out there that refutes your notion that the development committee came up with the standards in a vacuum with zero input and that there was zero vetting - and B.) it's a logical fallacy to assume the product must be flawed even if the process were flawed. It's not necessarily a valid conclusion to make.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics