Reply to GA Case

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "GA Case"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If you want to see Trump go down, you have to be enraged that Willis/Wade, relatively unintelligent, lazy, inexperienced and palpably crooked prosecutors, were selected to handle this case. There are hundreds, maybe more than a thousand, highly intelligent, experienced, deadly serious and honest Democrat-oriented prosecutors and civil trial attorneys who would have done this trial for little or no pay. This entire disqualification catastrophe would never have happened -- even a relatively unintelligent, inexperienced prosecutor would know not to hire their married lover as a lawyer, let alone the lead lawyer, on this case bc of exactly this disqualification circus. [/quote]

Willis was not “selected” to handle the case.  She’s the DA for Fulton county.  She is the only person in the world who has authority bring state criminal charges for crimes committed in Fulton county.  [/quote]

Willis CHOSE to bring this case.  And, some wonder what role the WH had in encouraging her to bring charges considering the background of Jeff DiSantis, the Deputing DA and spokesperson for Fulton County. 
There is nothing illegal about Trump urging Raffensperger to investigate the election results especially considering the shenanigans that went on the evening of the election. [/quote]

Trump was caught on tape telling him to find more votes. You’re insane PP. Trump is guilty AF. The election was clean. Your guy lost. Don’t let him drag you down into thinking otherwise. You look like a total fool.[/quote]

Votes or illegal votes?[/quote]

Exactly.  "Find more votes" = do a recount and investigate the shenanigans.  [/quote]

This is not true.  The Trump campaigned officially requested recounts.  Georgia performed two automated recounts and one hand recount.  All results came within about 6% of each other.  The original tally dropped from just over 12K advantage to Biden to just under 12K, by about 800 votes.  The state performed an automatic recount and then two additional recounts AT TRUMP'S REQUEST.  They performed a second automated one and then a hand recount.  The secretary of state's office had already responded to multiple state groups including both chambers of the legislature with a point by point refutation of the arguments that former President made and after the refutation, both chambers approved the official total and authorized the secretary of state to confirm the election results.

Go back and read the transcripts.  The former President is making wildly unconfirmed accusations and trying to pressure the secretary of state to perjure himself.  The president makes multiple allegations and when the secretary of state says that they have refuted each of these points to the state Senate, the former president then tries to pressure him that he was wrong.  If the secretary of state was wrong, then he would have perjured himself before the state Senate and could lose his job.  The former President then tries to put political pressure on the secretary of state to make him change his sworn testimony and word.

This is not a simple request for a recount.  That was already done.  You need to read the transcript about what was actually said and then put it in context of WHEN this all happened.

Here's the transcript for those who have not read it:  [url]https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/03/politics/trump-brad-raffensperger-phone-call-transcript/index.html[/url][/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics