Reply to GA Case

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "GA Case"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][twitter]https://twitter.com/lawofruby/status/1762559278680830269[/twitter]

Can we move on to the actual Trump/Georgia case now?[/quote]

LOL.  "Speculating."

I liked this interaction about his "speculation:"

“Why would you speculate when she was asking you a direct question about when the relationship started?” Sadow asked.

“I have no answer for that,” Bradley said.

“Except for the fact that you do in fact know when it started, and you don’t wanna testify to that in court,” Sadow said. “That’s the best explanation.”

Or this one:

“Mr. Bradley, ‘speculation’ is kind of a weaselly lawyer word. Let's speak truth here and you’re under oath,” defense attorney Richard Rice said at one point after Bradley again used the word.

Or this one:

In one testy exchange, Richard Rice, an attorney for defendant Robert Cheeley, asked Bradley whether “as a normal course of your relationship with your friends, do you pass on lies about your friends?”

“Have I passed on lies about my friends, is that what you’re asking?” Bradley responded.

“Is that something you normally do, Mr. Bradley?” Rice said. "Do you tell lies about your friends?”
Bradley responded: “Have I told lies about my friends? I could have. I don’t know.”

“Do you pass on lies about your friends in a case of national importance?” Rice pushed.

Bradley repeated, “I could have. I don’t know.”

His testimony was a disaster.  The defense presented him with texts that he had sent indicating that the affair "absolutely" began before Willis hired Wade.   And, he claimed ignorance.  
The judge saw through his lack of candor.  And, had little patience for the repeated "objections" from the state attorneys.  
Anyone with eyes and ears knows what happened.... he knew their relationship began long before Fani and Nathan testified it did, indicated that to Merchant via texts and conversations, but was trying desperately to cover his tracks.  
The judge is not dumb.  [/quote]

The convo started off with merchant asking what Bradley thinks, then she got what he thinks, and tried to enter it as evidence. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics