Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]“The reason this shoe is so sexy . . ,” literally a direct quote as she sits on the ground and bends over the boots wearing a very low cut dress. I guess she didn’t actually wear a coat to cover herself up all of the time when on set. Just another Lively lie.[/quote] She was not in costume during that coat incident, but seems to be in costume in the shoe video [/quote] And by “incident” you mean him saying “I like your outfit” lol. Lively supporters are wild. If in her sick mind she believes he only said that b/c her top was low cut, perhaps she should both seek help and stick to turtle necks.[/quote] He didn't say "I like your outfit." He said "sexy". And Jamey Heath really did walk in on her undressed, against her objections, and refuse to leave or turn away. And Baldoni and Heath really did pressure her to do the birth scene without a hospital gown. And Baldoni really did talk about violating consent with women before when he was with Blake in a car. Does this add up to sexual harassment? I'm honestly not sure. I think it's obnoxious, inappropriate behavior. It might not fit the legal definition of sexual harassment. But she certainly had a right to complain about it, and to ask for improved working conditions, and to not be punished for those complaints/requests via a PR campaign against her when the movie came out. I understand the arguments that Blake doesn't have a strong legal case. I think I might agree. I will never understand people who claim Baldoni's and Heath's behavior was a-ok and that they are the real victims here. So baffling to me. These guys sounds awful.[/quote] Your comment that you agree Blake doesn’t have a strong case but don’t see baldoni and heart as victims are imo contradictory. Not liking someone is not a reason to accuse them of SH. It’s a very serious and career ending allegation. She is being intentionally malicious. If Blake really thought after seeing Abel’s text that they had smeared her, she could have sued them just for retaliation and frames the NYT article differently. There’s no there there on the SH and I’m quite sure if you ask JB his biggest thing is clearing his name that he’s not a predator. They went too far here and her lawyers have truly done her a disservice. [/quote] I still think that sexual harassment was chosen because it would allow Hoover to recover rights to the sequel and sell to Blake/Ryan.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics