Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Religion
Reply to "Yoga is Hindu. Period."
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]BTW, thanks for the link to the paper ABOUT the genetic study http://www.patheos.com/blogs/drishtikone/2009/09/aryan-invasion-theory-myth-large-harvard-study/[/quote] Well gee, if you wanted the actual article so bad, all you had to do was ask: https://genetics.med.harvard.edu/reich/Reich_Lab/Press_files/Fountain%20Ink%20-%20December%202013%20-%20Cover.pdf Let's get quoting, because you [i]love[/i] doing that! :D It's so much easier to just quote random folks without making your own arguments or bothering to refute other people's arguments, right? [i]It’s hard to convert even the learned though there is increasing evidence that the Aryan invasions never took place. Most of it has come from archaeology and the hard sciences but it is only recently that historians have grudgingly started to accept the need to revise their accounts. The evidence comes from geology, hydrology, archaeology, remotely sensed data from satellite imagery, analysis of palaeo-waters, all of which call for rigour. Each study by itself may be inconclusive but if the conclusions are unimpeachable the cumulative evidence could provide a radically different picture. [/i] Oh, did you catch the last sentence there? [b]Each study by itself may be inconclusive but if the conclusions are unimpeachable the cumulative evidence could provide a radically different picture. [/b] When did the migration take place? According to genetic testing (which I know you hate, I know I know, science is bad, science is the evil tool of Hindu fanatics), around 12,500 years ago. [i]Metspalu summarises: “So the scenario at present seems to show that there were two populations colonising South Asia, one close to West Eurasian populations but not derived of them recently. These two populations lived in broad South Asia with little mixing for a long time before admixing quite abruptly relatively recently.” (If that ends up being confirmed, it would mean that both proponents and opponents of the Aryaninvasion/migration theories are in a sense simultaneously right and wrong—yes, foreigners entered an already inhabited India; but they did so so long ago that they might as well be thought of as original inhabitants too."[/i] [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics