Reply to The subtle micro aggressions of islamophobia

Forum Index » Religion

Reply to "The subtle micro aggressions of islamophobia"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
You want to cast judgment on our religion. Fine. But don't post false or misleading facts. This started with an egregious post declaring our prophet a pedophile. Who posted that and where is the apology for that post? [/quote]

That was wrong. There is no evidence Muhammad was a pedophile since he had lots of wives/concubines of mature age.  Besides, Aisha and her family made out on that marriage big time - BIG TIME - so there is no reason to complain whatsoever.

[quote=Anonymous]
Then our local DCUM islamic expert here said there was no equality (or equity) in Islam for women. [/quote]
There isn't any equality in Islam for women. I never mentioned the word equity so stop making things up.

[quote=Anonymous]
Who best to determine that but one who lives under the umbrella of that system? [/quote]

That is actually the best part of what you wrote.  The translation for this is "only Muslims can judge Islam. Kuffar should shut up. Unless they are non-Muslim "historians" who agree with the beauty of Islam like Esposito.  If they don't, well, they are kuffar unfit to have an opinion."

[quote=Anonymous]
Then our fake expert said the jahiliyah period was a farce. World historians and scholars disagree with her. Wheres the apology for that because inherent in that statement was an accusation Muslims lied. [/quote]

Maybe you should take it up with Dr. Ahmed, our subtle micro-agressor against Islam who said this, CAPS MINE:

“Islamic civilization developed a construct of history that labeled the pre-Islamic period the Age of Ignorance (BRANDING) and projected Islam as the sole source of all that was civilized (SOMEWHAT LIKE LYING) – and used that construct so effectively in its [b]rewriting of history [/b] (ANOTHER WORD FOR LYING) that the peoples of the Middle East lost all knowledge of the past civilizations of the religion (YOU PEOPLE DON'T KNOW ANY MORE WHAT IT WAS LIKE BEFORE ISLAM). Obviously that construct was [b]ideologically serviceable[/b] (SUITABLE TO MUSLIM DISCOURSE), successfully concealing (LYING), among other things, the fact that in some cultures of the Middle East women had been considerably better off before the rise of Islam than afterwards.” (ISLAM WASN'T ALL THAT GREAT AND PRE-ISLAMIC PERIOD WASN'T ALL THAT BAD)

Bad, bad Leila Ahmed. That damn Islamophobe.

You should also take it up with Hatoon Al-Fassi, by the way. Or perhaps you'd like to pretend her scholarship doesn't exist. I notice you tend to like people Al-Saud does, and dislike the people they dislike.  Commendable consistency, then! Makes sense you would go to town with Esposito but ignore a Saudi woman scholar. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics