Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Proposal is up!"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I thought the at-risk priority only applied to schools that were under 30% at-risk.[/quote] My bad. I think you are right. But, I think my point is still valid. My IB school is far from stellar and not currently on the list, but isn't very far from being 70% non-at risk is you use the stated definition: "The at-risk weight applies to students who are homeless, in the District’s foster care system, qualify for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) or the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), [b]or high school students that are one year older, or more, than the expected age for the grade in which the students are enrolled.[/b]" [/quote] So, red-shirted boys at private schools now have at-risk priority to transfer OOB to Wilson? They better change that to 2 years.[/quote] +1. I hope that simply being a year behind is not enough. You would also have to have some other qualifying at risk marker to get preference. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics