Reply to Bowe Bergdahl

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Bowe Bergdahl"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Anyone who wanders straight into the enemy, unarmed, and unprepared, is mentally ill. He should be brought back and conservatives will regret attacking him so quickly.  [/quote]

That is not the only possibility.  There may be another reason he “wanders straight into the enemy” but I am not even going to state the reason because it would be called a “conspiracy theory.”  I also won’t call your excuse a way to rationalize bad behavior, either. [/quote]

Well, he didn't act like a deserter.  A deserter is interested in self-preservation.

He obviously didn't join them like some jihadi.

He didn't bring a weapon with him, so he wasn't going postal like that solider who shot up a village.

The only thing left is "death by cop".[/quote]

No. The other possibility is that he did intend to join them like some jihadi, but that the Taliban decided that he was much more useful to them as a POW. Considering what they got for Bergdahl, I would say that such a decision would have proved to have been spectacularly correct.[/quote]

He didn't take his weapon.  If he wanted to fight for them, he would take his weapon.[/quote]

Laugh, no. If he were carrying his weapon and they spotted him first (much the more likely possibility) they would simply have shot him on sight. Under no circumstances would they have ever allowed him to keep his weapon or engage in combat on their behalf without a considerable amount of time passing. The way he could aid them right away was to give them information on how better to kill American soldiers. He didn't need any weapon for that.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics