Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Bowe Bergdahl"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Anyone who wanders straight into the enemy, unarmed, and unprepared, is mentally ill. He should be brought back and conservatives will regret attacking him so quickly. [/quote] That is not the only possibility. There may be another reason he “wanders straight into the enemy” but I am not even going to state the reason because it would be called a “conspiracy theory.” I also won’t call your excuse a way to rationalize bad behavior, either. [/quote] Well, he didn't act like a deserter. A deserter is interested in self-preservation. He obviously didn't join them like some jihadi. He didn't bring a weapon with him, so he wasn't going postal like that solider who shot up a village. The only thing left is "death by cop".[/quote] No. The other possibility is that he did intend to join them like some jihadi, but that the Taliban decided that he was much more useful to them as a POW. Considering what they got for Bergdahl, I would say that such a decision would have proved to have been spectacularly correct.[/quote] He didn't take his weapon. If he wanted to fight for them, he would take his weapon.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics