Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "NMSFs in DC 2026"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Someone just posted list on private school forum: BASIS (2) Edmund Burke (1) DC International School (1) Georgetown Day School (4) Georgetown Visitation (2) Jackson-Reed (3) MacArthur HS (1) Maret (1) National Cathedral School (5) School Without Walls (3) Sidwell Friends (4) St Albans (2) St Anselm's Abbey (3) St John's College HS (1) Washington International (1) Washington Latin Public Charter (3) [/quote] On a percentage of class size basis, St Anselm’s would be the winner by a long shot, right? And for non-selective admission schools that also don’t attempt to weed out students (all 4 of those), I’d say it’s Latin for the win.[/quote] Looking at all charter schools in DC rhyming with fatten, it is Latin with a tremendous win over every other school!!!! Nos sumus optima![/quote] I don't get the mocking of Latin. It has more semifinalists that nearly all of the private schools on a per student basis. [/quote] NP. No one is mocking Latin. PP is mocking the Latin booster who claims that Latin is a wonderful school because it had a few NMSFs this year. The fact is that the school is mid. Some kids don’t even graduate or go to college. Having a few top NMSF scorers this year (Latin typically has zero NMSF) doesn’t show that the school is good.[/quote] First of all, thank you for proving me right! Someone earlier in the thread wrote that "no one hates Latin," and I said that, actually, there's one poster who is obsessed with calling Latin "mid". And here you are! As if someone called your name! Secondly, can you please quit using the word "mid." It's really more of a word for 16 year olds, and this forum just isn't for people that age. Thirdly, rather than just giving a vague insult, perhaps you could let us know what you even mean by "mid." As far as i can tell, Latin is a good school with hard working teachers and students. By all objective measures, it's better than most schools in DC. The test scores reflect this, as do the experiences with the school we hear about from parents. Fourth, you are very fortunate, because no one is ever, ever going to force you to send your child to Latin. Your long nightmare is over! Fifth, I would love it if we could stop slamming other schools and simply be happy that many good options are available to our children that weren't options for the students before them. It's just petty. And pointless, unless your goal is to make hardworking teachers and students feel worse about education in our city. Good charter schools are helping more students stay in the city. This is reflected in the statistics published by the city. The high school years in DCPS and charter high schools have shown more overall growth than any other band of grades. There's potential for a lot more growth in the future. [/quote] Insecure Latin Parent reenters the discussion! No one was taking shots at Latin. They were making fun of people twisting logic and reason to support their desired conclusion. Regarding the word vomit of your defensiveness, are you new to the interwebs? A single poster calls your school "mid" and you decide this is a correlated attack? Grow up. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics