Reply to NYT: "The Trouble with Men"

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "NYT: "The Trouble with Men""

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Yes you can have a kid on your own but depriving that kid of a mom or a dad is a selfish decision. [/quote]
Something like 25% of kids are being raised without a father. I hope you admonish every dead beat loser who puts a check in the mail instead of being a father. [/quote]

Way more than that. Look at the actual stats and data. Talk to your sociologist and social worker friends.

Babies out of wedlock? >>25% of births

Children age 0-18 with no father figure ever?  >>25% of minors

[/quote]

This is deliberate.  Encouraging dependence of women and children on the government has been and continues to be a key part of the strategy of the Democratic party in the US and progressive governments elsewhere.

The easiest way to do that is to provide lots of social and legal incentives to discourage the formation of intact nuclear families.  Anything that undercuts the traditional heterosexual nuclear family is fair game.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics