Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "DC Soccer Club"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Should a CXO be fired for making non-consensual sexual advances toward a subordinate via text?[/quote] If it was unwanted, reported, continued and the club refused to act -- yes. [/quote] But that's the thing, according to Tom's own complaint that he sent everyone, it did stop and the club did act (just didn't fire her).[/quote] I don’t know — I think the timeline matters here. The February/March dates in his complaint line up with when DCSC started walking back what they originally promised legacy BFC parents. It seems like there could be some retaliation for Tom continuing to push for more support at work. Also, I’m curious who actually conducted the investigation. Was it an outside party? Because if it was internal, then of course they’d find no wrongdoing. Promises were made to all DCSC families — and they were kept for legacy DCSC families — but not for NE or legacy BFC families. Pulling back on the third tournament was a real low blow. The optics, at least to me, aren’t great.[/quote] The club over promised to all families over the last 3 years. And not everyone received what they were told to expect. This is the act of a desperate man. If this was all he had, then he has to be grasping at straws. And look, I get that Brookland families were promised things but in the grand scheme they have come a long way. With as boutique as t’s club was I highly doubt he was financially stable as a business. This is likely a money grab from a disgruntled guy facing the reality of soccer in DC. To steal DCSC’s data and then turn around and market to those families is so underhanded that it’s hard to believe DCSC isn’t going to litigate this guy into the ground. And the thing left unsaid is that he has tried to ruin someone’s life in the process. None of us are seeing the other side of the story. If he calls banter sexual harassment in a email campaign, then the real victim may have recourse. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics