Reply to Supreme Court to hear case on opting out of lessons with LGBTQ+ books

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Supreme Court to hear case on opting out of lessons with LGBTQ+ books"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]All of you arguing that this is about religious freedom and not homophobia are strange. If a school taught a book where the main character eats pork, it would not be offensive to muslim or kosher students because they themselves aren't eating pork. Religious freedom is about what you do, not what the people around you do. [/quote]

Wrong. The equivalent would be a school deliberately choosing to have teachers read a series of books about eating pork, and then launching a teacher-led classroom discussion about why it’s ok to eat pork, then saying parents can opt out from those lessons, and then rescinding that option under political pressure.

Get it now?[/quote]

No it’s like reading a book where people are eating bacon for breakfast and asking to opt out because it’s pork.[/quote]

Nope.

National review: “Teachers are instructed to lead classroom discussions about the books, which cite terms such as, “intersex,” “drag queen,” and “non-binary.”[b] One book claims that doctors only “guess” when determining a newborn’s sex.[/b]” NTD: “The board instructed employees responsible for selecting the books to use an “LGBTQ+ Lens” and to question whether “cisnormativity,” “stereotypes,” and “power hierarchies” are “reinforced or disrupted,” the petition said.“[/quote]

Insanity. I would say more about where this gender ideology comes from but it’s highly controversial [/quote]
this site is anonymous. i’m curious to hear your thoughts.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics