Reply to DOJ, RIP

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "DOJ, RIP"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I have a simple question--can't this get the guy who said he'd drop the charges disbarred?  It's clear that it's an illegal move.  Others from DOJ are publicly saying it's illegal.  So ... how does this not injure him?[/quote]
Another question - DP here - why doesn’t Bove file the dismissal and argue for it himself?[/quote]

This is a way to get attorneys to resign without any severance or lawsuits. Eventually they will find a lawyer to sign their name and then will fire the lawyer when they have issues with their bar license.[/quote]

Why not call the bluff?  Let her fire them.  Then they can all file a lawsuit.  Especially since the woman in NY already made it so public as to what is happening.  I would that would be the smarter chess move in this scenario instead of retreating the King.  [/quote]

This happens in US Attorney's offices.  DOJ steps in and says don't prosecute.  I've posted this before.  I know for a fact this is true.  It's not frequent, but it happens.[/quote]
NP. [b]I'm a former prosecutor turned big law attorney turned in-house decisionmaker.[/b] It is actually the norm for DOJ to supersede and direct the USAO's decision making on cases with political significance and backseat drive the entire process.

The media is playing up this current instance because there is an agenda to make Trump look bad. Also, Trump's cronies have zero finesse. You just don't put some things in writing unless you're a moron. These people are morons.

Now, I'm not saying that the practice of setting aside the letter of the law and letting politics be the deciding factor in charging, negotiations, and dismissals is a good thing. But that's how things are and that practice does not change from administration to administration. [/quote]

No, you're not. You're full of it. And seven experienced DOJ lawyers who resigned say you are too.

Just read the motion they filed asking for the case to be dismissed. I've never read a motion where every paragraph begins with

[i]“The Acting Deputy Attorney General has determined…and has directed…”

“The Acting Deputy Attorney General has also concluded…”[/i]  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

[/quote]
PP here. Adults are talking. Be on your way.[/quote]

So mature[/quote]

DP.

That post was unnecessarily condescending but the previous poster talking about politics and prosecution at the DOJ was largely full of sht.[/quote]
There are many PPs at this point. Which PP do you say is full of it?

Fyi the big law to in-house lawyer was spot on. If everything in that post wasn't obviously true to you, then you definitely haven't negotiated any high profile cases with the govt. That's all right - most people haven't, but don't opine as if you're in the know when you're not. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics