Reply to RTO EO is up

Forum Index » Jobs and Careers

Reply to "RTO EO is up "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What are we thinking at SEC?

My view is this EO is cover for the agency heads who want staff back full time - and want to please the WH - to do so. Some obviously really really want to please Trump - see Marco Rubio and make Maga happy. But what about outsiders like Atkins? I mean he's a Trump appointee so I can see wanting to play ball. But he's not looking to run for political office either and may not be interested in engaging in a ongoing fight with the union over every little thing. Are the financial regulators going to run with the "applicable law" part - i.e. we have a CBA in place?

I live close to the office so NBD for me but I def have colleagues who are worried who bought houses as far as Richmond.[/quote]

The SEC will promulgate a policy with as much wiggle room as the EO. Managerial discretion, exemptions, ad hoc, blah blah blah. I don’t envy managers who will be dealing with this as their full time job now. [/quote]

But will it try to apply it to bargaining unit employees and rescind the CBA [/quote]

They'll try but the CBA is a contract - it's not like you can rescind it without litigation which drags it out a number of years.[/quote]

And in the meantime employees are coming into the office five days per week![/quote]
You clearly don’t understand labor law, contracts or injunctions, so please step aside. [/quote]

You seem awfully confident a judge would issue an injunction.

[/quote]
If they are following the law, they most certainly will. [/quote]

NP to this discussion but that's not my understanding of how this process works.  My understanding is that the union has to grieve the breach of the CBA to the agency first (probably a mass grievance since it will affect many people and it's easier for everyone to deal with this all together).  Obviously, in this case where the action initiated from the agency they are not going to reverse management's decision.  The union can then appeal to the FSIP.  The FSIP decision as I understand it is not appealable to the court.

The tough part is that while all of this is pending employees are required to RTO as ordered and the whole process can take about a year to play out.[/quote]

The FSIP is for impasses in negotiations of the CBA, not for grievances.  Grievances are generally arbitrated and the arbitrator has the power to order a stay pending arbitration.  The arbitration result can then be appealed to federal court.[/quote]

PP here and interesting, perhaps I misunderstood what was explained to me. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics