Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Debate Moderator Fact Checks"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Trump had every opportunity to win the debate with substance. He failed, which is completely on-brand for him.[/quote] Where was VP Harris' substance? She couldn't even answer the very first question (do you believe Americans are better off than they were 4 years ago?) without pivoting quickly into her own alleged upbringing an what she planned to do. The real-time tracking of the debate showed independent voters tracking more with Republicans than Democrats. Likewise, independent voters who watched the debate expecting to learn more about VP Harris' policy positions and future plans came away with little more than they had before the debate. Former President Trump lost his cool when baited by VP Harris. He shouldn't have, but doing so didn't do her any favors with independent voters. Yet at the same time, he made numerous key points that resonated with independent voters. Can VP Harris really say the same? The press doesn't seem to think so after interviewing independent voters, who mostly seemed to say that they wanted to "see the fine print" of her plans. By the same token, independent voters seem to remember how much better off economically they were under Former President Trump, a feeling that is difficult to dislodge without a clear path from VP Harris that she can do the same. The reason? She has been VP for over 3.5 years and many of the promised benefits of the legislation she voted for haven't come to pass, so promises of future prosperity fell flat. Things have gotten worse, not better, for most Americans.[/quote] Actually, KH nanswered the Moderators questions. Unlike Trump [/quote] No she didn’t. First question out of the gate was are Americans better off than four years ago. Her answer? She has a “passion for small business.” Wut? [b]She literally has never worked a day in the private sector in her adult life.[/b] She’s never met a regulation she didn’t like. Did the moderators press here for a yes or no? Of course not. [/quote] And Trump has never had a real job or worked for anyone but himself ever. He ran multiple businesses including casinos into the ground. Casinos..which are almost idiot proof. Also, tons and tons of fraud in which he is still facing the consequences (e.g., his charity, the Trump org, etc.). He inherited the equivalent of $400 million in inflation adjusted dollars and might not even have that to his name. Had he simply invested his inheritance in the S&P 500, he'd be an actual billionaire. Also, citation please on "regulations she didn't like." [/quote] Kamala: I have a passion for fishing. Moderator: Have you ever been fishing? Kamala: No. Moderator: Thank you Madame VP. Now one for President Trump, why are you trying to destroy the country? That for 90 minutes. [/quote] Cute straw man. Too bad your guy was talking about illegals eating dogs and cats, concepts of plans, Victor Orban, and crowd sizes for 90 minutes. He's been running for 9 years. Why doesn't he have a plan for healthcare, infrastructure, education, economy, immigration, whether he'd support approve/veto a national abortion ban, and Israel? All I heard were vague soundbites about how he would "solve Israel and Ukraine" but no details. Oh that's right...because Project 2025 is very, very unpopular. [/quote] The whole thing is just so absurd. He could have won the debate if he knew...anything, really. But instead he decides to use his time lying about Haitians eating pets, and his idiot sycophants in the media and on this board complain that he lost because he was fact-checked a few times on his most obvious lies. [b]He lost because he can't articulate on a single relevant policy point.[/b][/quote] Exactly. He's lazy, senile and stupid. And even then, all he had to do was stick a script on each of these key issues. Nope. Couldn't do it. Took her bait every time. Because that's what I want to see in my President. A thin-skinned, easily manipulated narcissist with access to the nuclear codes.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics