Reply to Newsflash: celebs are awful to interviewers

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Newsflash: celebs are awful to interviewers"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I just saw an interview Blake did where she said she gets into a character for all her roles by thinking about her characters style. So literally she preps for roles thinking about fashion. But don’t talk to her about fashion I guess cause it’s sexist or something.

Make it make sense.

[/quote]

It's just exactly the sort of thing a narcissist would do, right? Make other people feel crazy by putting them in this impossible situation of demanding they pay attention to, and remark on, every thing you do - while at the same time, being totally volatile and unpredictable about what will set you off.[/quote]

Imagine pregnant women with raging hormones being unpredictable. Who knew?[/quote]

Do you really want to go in that direction? That's the line of argument used to say that women shouldn't hold positions of power.

And even if that is the reason, Blake Lively could have apologized - which (to the best of my knowledge) she has not done.[/quote]

I am a HS teacher who taught from 3 months pregnant until a week before I gave birth.  You don’t think the students I taught said nasty things ever? I held my tongue and controlled my ‘raging hormones’.  Because I’m an effing adult.[/quote]

Right but we give leeway to people all the time. Parent died? Sick kid? Divorce? Cancer? Illness? Surgery? We do it alll the time. Women don’t need to pretend to be superhuman while pregnant lest they be considered weak and ineffectual or unqualified because people can’t handle it.[/quote]

Of course. Celebs deserve some grace. I think people are just fed up with blake and Ryan selling us one million different things at one million different times. There are some interesting marketing and business analysts takes on why this is getting such backlash and it has to do with really needing to be authentic with your brand. This kind of interview where you look catty and petty doesn’t help the brand. And they’ve been shoving the brand down our throats for a long time. Another poster put it perfectly when she said their side hustles have clearly overtaken their acting projects and it’s wearing thin especially in fans who were really rooting for this movie adaptation of a beloved book.

I’m sure in the long run this couple and their $350 mill will be just fine. [/quote]

NP sounds like a personal wish of yours. Also, learn the difference between net worth and cash. A $350M net worth DOES NOT mean you have $350M in the bank. I'm not saying they're poor but if the aggressive and, quite frankly, desperate manner with which she was promoting her tacky wares is indicative of anything is that, they're not rich enough to stop working.[/quote].

In what world are these people not rich enough to stop working!?!? That’s insane. They are likely addicted to money and fame but they don’t need more of either. [/quote]

Again, you need to be careful when discussing money matters. It's better to err on the side of doubts as opposed to speaking in matter-of-factly terms like you as if you were their personal money manager. The clues are there for anyone smart enough to see.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics