Reply to Massive pentagon leak re Ukraine conflict

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Massive pentagon leak re Ukraine conflict "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Per the NYTs, these documents would’ve only been viewable in a SCIF. And phones & cameras are banned from SCIFs.

So how did a camera get inside a SCIF?

My money is that this leak is from someone inside Congress[/quote]

Oh, FFS.  Someone in Congress did not leak this.

Perhaps if leaks had been taken more seriously in the past, this crap would not be happening.

People have been leaking stuff for a while now, and very rarely suffer any ramifications.  [/quote]
Republican congressmen showed during the first impeachment that they have no respect for SCIFs.[/quote]

Exactly.  And everyone I know who works in SCIFs is under strict rules about phones and cameras.  [/quote]

I will snicker a little when we find that this leak was from some far-left Democrat trying to impress his friends.  [/quote]
❌❌❌
He’s a “young, charismatic gun enthusiast.”[/quote]

Washington Post reporters got hold of members of the Discord channel where the leaks were posted, they know the poster, and said he is in his 20s, currently serving in the military, conservative, gun enthusiast, and he got the documents from a military base that he serves on.   https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/04/12/discord-leaked-documents/

Will probably get caught very soon.[/quote]

Oh this is a lot of stuff being leaked. Not many people have access to all these docs. Should be easy to track him down.[/quote]

Need to find him like immediately. I don't want to be gruesome, but there's a self-harm risk here.[/quote]

I would assume that they've already identified him.  Heck the WaPo puff piece about him and the kids he groomed has enough detail in it for anyone with subpoena power to easily follow the trail.  All that's left now is to find out whether the leaker was just an insecure narcissist trying to impress a bunch of teenagers or something more sinister.  Either way the mom from that article needs to hire their son a lawyer ASAP.[/quote]

Why did the mom let her son speak to WaPo in the first place?! The kid didn’t even obstruct his voice too[/quote]

Uhm maybe mom wants the protection that comes with being a known entity. If the kid remained anonymous and never said anything to anyone, it would be a lot easier to manipulate him further, if people wanted to. That’s my take anyway. I think it was smart.[/quote]

His name was Lucca he lived on the second floor [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics