Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Money and Finances
Reply to "SVB failure "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Ok bear with me here. This is why the FRB needs a union, pronto. We don’t know why supervision failed here, but it did. We know historically (and I know personally) that retaliation against bank examiners happens. I’ll bet anything that there were FRB examiners trying to raise alarm bells who were silenced, either directly or due to a culture of fear/retaliation. A union will help ensure examiners can speak freely and press their concerns forward. [/quote] FRBSF is a disaster right now. They had FTX/Moonstone, Silvergate, and now SVB on their watch. I believe a number of SVB execs are FRBSF alums. A union starts to make sense if there are legit complaints of retaliation and silencing. But I bet the banks & Congress would fight it tooth & nail. Is there a statutory ban on a union within the FRS?[/quote] No ban. But FR culture is very economist dominated and economists tend to disdain unions. I have not seen any evidence that unions at the FDIC and OCC have done anything to make their examiners feel free to speak up without retaliation. All of the agencies' supervisory areas suffer from group think among a few in power and an insufficient culture of challenge, even as they criticize banks for lack of a challenge function. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics