Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Religion
Reply to "Atheism’s sexual misconduct problem "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Maybe it’s time to recap the majority atheist response on this thread. 1. Dawkins may have sold millions of books and delivered hundreds of lectures, but he lectures to people directly instead of through an organization so his support for pedophilia isn’t my problem. 2. Harris and Silverman: crickets 3. NAMBLA—the only case any of you feel comfortable talking about 4. I wanna talk about the Catholic Church instead of atheist abusers! Talking about atheist abusers makes widdle me uncomfortable! Waaaaahhhh![/quote] 1) Dawkins is not an atheist abuser because he was never accused of anything. Not sure what you are talking about. He also is not the head of an atheist organization. 2. Did they molested anyone? 3. Are there any documented cases of nambla members molesting anyone? Can you provide that information? If so, close the organization. If not, atheists still disavow it. It’s gross. Just because the person who started it was atheist does not make it some kind of atheist church. 4. I provided you many verified instances of millions of children being molested by church’s. You did not provide a single example of an atheist molestation, and we are all still waiting. You talk fluff but have not provided anything.[/quote] 1. Dawkins says he was groped in school by his teachers and it wasn’t so bad, so he supports pedophilia. You can’t possibly argue that nobody listens to Dawkins. 2. I provided documented cases of Silverman and the prominent atheist physicist that Harris defended. Others provided instances of abuse in secular institutions like schools and sports. 3. NAMBLA’s whole purpose is to promote man-boy love. If you think that’s OK, with or without documented instances, you’re disgusting. 4. Stop trying to derail this thread by talking about priests. Start your own thread so you don’t look like a dishonest discussant. I realize this thread is uncomfortable for you, but you can ignore it. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics