Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Insurrection Hearings 6/28 and beyond"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Cheney to General Flynn: "Do you believe in the peaceful transition of power in the U.S.?" General Flynn: "Fifth." That's terrifying. [/quote] Always remember that his brother was the Army Chief of Operations, was one of the people that orevented the DC Nat Guard from being deployed (a fact that the DOD lied about), and was given a promotion. All of this was in the timeframe in question. He's currenty in charge of Pacific Command.[/quote] Being related to a treason-weasel isn't a crime. I haven't seen anything to suggest that the brother is loony, only Flynn. And he's been a loon for a long time. [/quote] Except the Flynn brother significantly delayed troop support to the Capitol Police. It's not a stretch to believe that he was in on the coup and wanted the rioters to succeed. [/quote] No. We can agree to disagree but I believe that was the right call. The insurrectionists were handled very well by the Capitol Police and by MPD. The National Guard and other troops were not needed and should not have been called there. [/quote] Oh well if [i]you[/i] believe that was the right call because all the insurrectionists were allowed to walk free (because the Capitol Police was deliberately understaffed, underarmed and unprepared) then clearly no one needed to call anyone and this makes the other Flynn’s decision to slow the response totally acceptable! [/quote] Well, I don't know if it was the right call or not but it was a reasonable decision, not indicative of "wanting the rioters to succeed". There's no evidence that he was in on the coup. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics