Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Youngkin creates tip line for parents and students to report teachers for Thought Crime"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why has this devolved to talking about teaching slavery? It isn't about not teaching about slavery and the associated political history. This is about so-called anti-racist and CRT influenced ideas being used in public schools. Call it the successor ideology, whatever you want. If this were about not teaching slavery or Jim Crow, and so on, it would have been an issue three, four, five, six, seven... years ago. But it wasn't. Why?[/quote] Because there are Virginia high schools that do NOT teach slavery. My kid met a fellow freshman from VA at college (they are freshmen, btw) and [b]the kid says he never learned about slavery in APUSH. Said it was taught as a states right issue. [/b] I find it laughable that the GOP is afraid of the big bad China right now. Do you know what they don't teach in their history books - the cultural revolution. It does not exist. Of course, I reported this to the hotline. [/quote] Re: the bolded - BS BS BS. Stop lying. You just look absurd. https://apcentral.collegeboard.org/pdf/ap-us-history-course-a-glance-0.pdf?course=ap-united-states-history https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.doe.virginia.gov%2Ftesting%2Fsol%2Fstandards_docs%2Fhistory_socialscience%2F2015%2Fstsd-2015-hss-va-ushistory.docx&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK[/quote] I reread my post and he did not learn about slavery as a civil rights issue in the CIVIL WAR. They taught that it was a states right issue only. Based on what you posted that is entirely possible given that it specifically says they only talk about slavery in 1607-1754 in British Colonies. Sure, the second piece says it mentions Frederick Douglass, but I see plenty here that could be open to conservative interpretation.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics