Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "University Of California Reaches Final Decision: No More Standardized Admission Testing"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This really would have hurt me. I was a great student, but I know that my score of 1500 on the SAT is what got me into my top college. [/quote] But you don't know that. You were already a great student. You probably had great letters of recommendation. You probably wrote well. Did they REALLY need the SAT to tell them you were qualified/competitive/etc?[/quote] DP. Two candiates with equal applications, but one has a 1500 and the other has 1300 - the 1500 is more qualified. This is about chosing between people. [/quote] The severe and mistaken presupposition this position and ones like it begin with is that admissions is like a track meet where the fastest times rank and claim the available prizes. It isn't. The colleges get to pick who they want to build the class they want. It they want to pick a candidate who is lower in every single academic category because they think they are a nice kid who will be an asset on the campus, they get to. That's it. They get to, as long as they violate no laws. Even if you think that is a bad decision by them, it is their decision to make. Once you understand that, you understand why many people feel test scores are a detriment to the process. For the record I am not anti-test and both my kids did well on theirs, including a first-time 36 and I am sure that helped their Ivy admission. But the schools get to choose who they want, just like employers get to hire who they want based on their own criteria - they don't have to hire the highest GPA.[/quote] Personally, I think that's fine for all private colleges, but state supported universities should be required to use more objective criteria. High performing students should not be shut out of the flagship in favor of "nice kids". [/quote] And how does any school know if your child is a “nice kid”? Most don’t do interviews. Social engineering is garbage and we will see the results of this experiment in 4 years when graduation rates decline. Either that - or there will be a shift in academic standards in grading. No surprise California schools in this boat. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics