Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "what's with local pols opposing expanding 270 and 495?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]RIght...remember when there were like 15 alternatives and then suddenly they were all excluded except the HOT PPP alternatives?[/quote] Care to provide a link so I can read about the 15 alternatives that were proposed and seriously studied?[/quote] DP. Here you go: https://495-270-p3.com/environmental/alternatives/ However, none of the alternatives were seriously studied. They were just there because federal law requires the study to include alternatives. It was obvious from the get-go that the Hogan adminsitration wanted HOT lanes with a P3, was only considering HOT lanes with a P3, and would only choose HOT lanes with a P3. [/quote] You don’t know what an EIS. [/quote] I'm the PP you're responding to, and if you follow the link, you can find the DEIS.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
