Reply to Would you take Tufts, Emory, Wash U over UVA?

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Would you take Tufts, Emory, Wash U over UVA? "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]William and Mary is probably more similar in size and feel to Washington University, Tufts, and Emory if that is what he wants.  UVA is great if he wants a larger school, different experience.  Perhaps schools like Duke, Columbia, Princeton, etc. would provide more opportunities, but I'm not convinced your private alternatives will.  Perhaps focus on that level as reach.  [/quote]

This kind of vague advice is why students fall for the “prestige” factor that may or may not matter for them personally.

[/quote]

It made sense to me.  They were just saying any difference in prestige wouldn't make much difference between the schools mentioned.  It might for schools like Duke and Columbia.[/quote]
I agree giving up in-state tuition at UVA means DC got into a top 10 school. UNless DC qualifies for significant financial aid. Also, Tufts isn't as good as UVA or the others, they just happen to be just as selective but academics wise the others are better. [/quote]

What about 11? Seriously though, where does the arbitrary line exist?[/quote]

Good question.  All anyone can really tell you is their opinion.  If I had to pay close to full vs. in-state for UVA or W&M and objective was perhaps law school, I'd say I'd find it hard not to send them to Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford, then probably Columbia, Duke, Brown, Dartmouth, Penn, perhaps Williams, Amherst, and maybe Rice.  If you are talking science, it would clearly open up MIT and Caltech.  Most of these are extremely tough admits.   So that is about 14 or so tops.  Many would add Chicago.  I'd draw the line before Vanderbilt, Notre Dame, Tufts, Emory, Wash U, etc.  This is all based on my situation and if I was fortunate enough to have a kid with those options.

It is clear that HYPS etc. do have significantly higher representation at elite law schools than UVA or W&M.  I recall seeing that about 25% of Yale law students are from Harvard and Yale, and remaining Ivy League plus Stanford take it to 50% plus.  But you have to consider that they probably had stellar SATs and would also get stellar LSATs.  [/quote]

Your numbers are wrong, especially at Harvard which is a very large law school.  Ivy League representation is way less than 50 percent.  [/quote]

This was the article I remember seeing on Yale.  I don't know about Harvard, but I would still think Ivy representation is very high compared to undergraduate population.

https://yaledailynews.com/blog/2011/04/18/up-close-tracing-the-elite-law-cycle/ [/quote]

I have never seen Harvard put numbers on it.  Just a list of institutions represented:  https://hls.harvard.edu/dept/jdadmissions/apply-to-harvard-law-school/undergraduate-colleges/
[/quote]

Yale is in a league of its own.  Also, your article is a little dated.  [/quote]

At least I'm offering real data points.  Here is a more recent view of Yale Law enrollment by undergraduate institutions from 2015.  Of the schools mentioned, Tufts had 1, Washington University had 7, Emory had 4, UVA had 6, and W&M had 3.

In comparison, Yale had 69, Harvard had 65, Princeton had 37, Columbia had 30, Brown had 22, Dartmouth 19, Amherst 18, Penn 17, Stanford 16, Berkeley 16,  and Williams and Duke 13.[/quote]

Forgot to add the link:  http://bulletin.printer.yale.edu/pdffiles/law.pdf[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics