Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "2019 AAP Results"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]You are trying to find patterns. There are no patterns.[/quote] The only pattern would be that they flipped the results :lol: [/quote] Seriously, give it a rest. A SMALL subsection (about 40 out of hundreds posted their score) of the AAP population posts in this board. And to extrapolate that the scores were flipped is crazy. Of course, people who got in that did not except to would post. And, those that with high scores that did not get in would post. But I am sure there are many, many, more people out there that got the results they were expected and do not feel the need to post their scores. [/quote] +1[/quote] Let's assume the pp is correct and only a small subsection of the scores had results similar to those posted here. Even if that's the case, don't you think this albeit small sampling (assuming the posts are truthful) shows a need for more transparency in the process. Some of the scores were incredibly low. If your child legitimately had high scores with no prepping and was rejected, while the low scores listed here were found eligible, are you saying you would not want more transparency as to why this happened? Maybe the letters weren't flipped, but the process needs more transparency. Alternatively, maybe there needs to be two ways to get in: 1. scores and 2. scores plus teacher recommendations. If FCPS is going to say scores are indicative of eligibility, a teacher shouldn't be able to override that, nor should an assumption of prepping if the GBRS commentary doesn't match the test scores. Having an objective admissions standard for automatically admitting students, and also allowing other student to get in based on a combination of scores and GBRS seems like a better process. I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss the concerns expressed her merely because they only account for a minority of applicants. You also have no clue whether this extrapolates into the general pool.[/quote] I never said there shouldn't be transparency. I just said don't rush to the judgement that a mistake was made based on the small sampling represented here. I think FCPS is doing the best it can. No, I don't work for FCPS. I think FCPS recognizes that test scores, alone, are not enough. Its no different than applying for college. Colleges look at much more than a high SAT/ACT score. They look at the whole package - recommendations, extracurricular activities, grades, etc. Scoring a perfect on the SAT is not going to get you into Harvard. So, why should a high CoGat score automatically qualify you for AAP? At the end of the day, its AAP. It is not going to make or break your child and their college path. [/quote] Scoring a perfect score on the SAT isn't going to get you into Harvard, but you also get the opportunity to pick the teachers who most likely support you to write your letters of recommendation. [b]Not the case in the AAP application process[/b]. The GBRS is super subjective and you don't get to pick who fills that out. But, more importantly, these are second graders we're talking about and, unlike Harvard, there is supposedly no limit on the number of kids admitted each year. I'm not saying this because my kid didn't get good GBRS commentary. My kid had great commentary and was found eligible. If the first grade teacher (who was no longer at the school) had input, I am willing to bet the commentary would have been way less glowing. If you have kids in AAP as currently structured you should know that any kid who has high scores and all As can definitely handle the curriculum. [/quote] I disagree. That is what the parent referral is for. You can provide your own recommendations, work samples, etc. to supplement what the school supplies. I know we were repeatedly told by our AART to do the parent referral and submit work samples. And, yes, I do have a child in the program. You are right, they should do well and handle the work load. However, you will be surprised the number that are struggling because of time management issues, less than stellar instruction, etc. [/quote] Disagree all you want, but parent referral means very little relative to the FCPS GBRS. And the packet specifically says other FCPS teachers can't write letters of recommendation. Also, it's likely that the many kids struggling with time management issues are the low scoring kids shoehorned in with good GBRS, rather than the high scoring kids who were found ineligible.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics