Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Do unmotivated kids get into HGC?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] Well, one barrier would be the reliance on a high test score, so let's look at other factors, ie, "holistic" approach. Why would MCPS commission a $1mil+ study which recommended "broadening the definition of gifted" and "increasing URM participation" and not follow the recommendations?[/quote] So you think that a single test score, on a single day, is a better measure of a student's ability? I don't. You evidently think that the only way to increase participation by black, poor, and Latino kids is to admit unqualified kids. For this to be true, the magnets would already have to have been including ALL of the qualified black, poor, and Latino kids. Do you think that the magnets were doing this? I don't. MCPS [b]is[/b] following the recommendations of the Metis study -- by trying to remove the barriers that were keeping out [b]qualified black, poor, and Latino kids. [/b] By the way, I really hope that you don't have any kids who will be admitted to a magnet program under the new processes, or, if you do, that you have nothing to do with the black or Latino kids in your kids' classes. Yes, I'm assuming that you're not black or Latino.[/quote] NP here. Define 'qualified' for me. What are the transparent and easily quantifiable criteria for 'giftedness'? If MCPS introduced 'the holistic approach', why did they do away with teacher's recommendations? You'd think that a homeroom teacher would notice a child who's off-the-charts gifted but just doesn't score well on standardized tests. Also, why did they simplify the test compared to years prior? The percentage of kids who actively prepped for the test was miniscule, the majority was still going in cold turkey. The only explanation that comes to mind is, MCPS wanted more kids - of all races - to score higher, which would give the system a chance to make up the racial composition of the gifted classes as they see fit using their 'broad definition of giftedness'. [b]If they'd truly wanted to level the playing field, they should have tested every single 3rd grader using the hard version of the test and then admit the top 3%.[/b] [/quote] Exactly. The only way to identify the truly top kids is to give a harder test and not a shorter test. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics