Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Breaking: Debbie Wasserman-Schulz' IT staffer arrested while trying to flee US "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous]Democrats now say that any access to sensitive information was “unauthorized.” But how hard could it have been to get “unauthorized” access when House Intelligence Committee Dems wanted their staffers to have unbounded access? In 2016, they wrote a letter to an appropriations subcommittee seeking funding so their staffers could obtain “Top Secret — Sensitive Compartmented Information” clearances. TS/SCI is the highest-level security classification. [b]Awan family members were working for a number of the letter’s signatories.[/b] https://fas.org/irp/congress/2016_cr/hpsci-hac.pdf[/quote] I don't know whether you don't understand this letter or if you are purposefully attempting to misrepresent it, but that letter simply requests funding for background investigations. Clearance would only be granted if the individuals passed the background checks. I think it is safe to say that the Awans would be very unlikely to pass background checks for clearances at that level. There is nothing in that letter to suggests that the Awans received any clearances, let along top secret. [/quote] I am not misrepresenting rather pointing out (now bolded) that the Awan's were still working for several of these members of Congress at the time. Something is fishy and this letter wouldn't be drafted without approval of the ranking member (DWS). Cover perhaps?[/quote] The letter suggests the exact opposite of a cover-up. If you have employees with skeletons in their closets that you don't want revealed, the last thing you would want is for federal agents to be digging into their past and personal affairs. [/quote] that's a good point. the fact that these shady characters had these very prestigious jobs is still very puzzling.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics