Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Secret report shows ‘special’ treatment for public officials in D.C. school lottery"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I am not convinced. Catania was louder and liked to put on a show of browbeating officials at a hearing but not much actually changed. And unfortunately one of his most serious reforms -- the at risk set aside -- hasn't been implemented. Oddly that idea is hated in Ward 3, where most of his ardent supporters live. [/quote] W3 would be fine with the set asides as long as it doesnt add to overcrowding. The only way it works is to build more schools in W3.[/quote] It could be headcount neutral. So you'd lose any of the OOB students now who aren't at risk and replace them with kids who are. [/quote] What's so desirable about 'at risk' kids. They tend disproportionately to be discipline problems and consume a disproportionate share of teacher attention and school resources, to the detriment of other kids.[/quote] STFU.[/quote] Ask not what at-risk kids can do for you, but what you can do for at-risk kids. smh.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics