Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "GA Case"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Getcha popcorn ready. [twitter]https://twitter.com/PhilHollowayEsq/status/1762264341401792998[/twitter][/quote] He tried to make the claim that pretty much anything he said fell under attorney-client privilege. Glad the judge took the time to investigate his claim. [/quote] Yes, that's called lawyering. Of course he claimed that. Not sure why communications between him and his client wouldn't be covered, TBH.[/quote] There are many exceptions but "fraud/Crime exception' would be one of several. :mrgreen: [/quote] Having an affair is not a crime. Or rather, the crime fraud exception is for crimes involving the lawyer and client - are you saying now that Wade was having an affair with his lawyer?[/quote] "Fraud on the Court" is an extreme form of "fraud" which is part of the fraud or crime exception.[/quote] The crime/fraud exception applies to getting advice on committing a crime. Did Bradley advise Wade on his testimony in this court? No. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics