Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "GA Case"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Unfortunately the cell phone records will only show a radius of where the phone could be pinged. For those asking where else he could have at those hours... google ATL strip clubs. [/quote] It will be interesting if they use this as a defense, given the following..... In court proceedings, Fulton County DA Fani Willis argues that the Atlanta Police Department's cell phone tracking software, in use since 2017, cannot "prove anything relevant" and provides "little evidentiary value." Under DA Fani Willis' jurisdiction, the Atlanta Police Department has utilized Hawk Analytics' "CellHawk" software since 2017. This very software documented Nathan Wade's alleged visits to Fani Willis' home 35 times before the purported beginning of their affair. In a recent court filing, Willis argues that CellHawk's software fails to establish "anything relevant" and provides "little evidentiary value." She further contends that CellHawk does not confirm "Special Prosecutor Wade's presence at any particular location or address." According to Willis, CellHawk merely indicates that "Special Prosecutor Wade's telephone was located somewhere within a densely populated multiple-mile radius where various residences, restaurants, bars, nightclubs, and other businesses are located." Does Fulton County DA Fani Willis maintain that the cellphone tracking software used by the Atlanta Police Department fails to "prove anything relevant" and offers "little evidentiary value"? Since the adoption of CellHawk by the Atlanta Police Department in 2017, has the Fulton County District Attorney's office utilized this software to prosecute any cases? [twitter]https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1761510000487547063[/twitter] [/quote] In this particular instance, the cell phone information provided 2 cell phone towers for location triangulation - accurate triangulation requires 3 cell phone towers. So it is likely that he was somewhere in a large geographic zone - that includes both Willis's apartment and many other places including bars that are open late. In other words, little evidentiary value. [/quote] It would depend on where Nathan lives. How likely is it for him to be at these other places? I doubt he would want to present that as a defense. If he were on trial for perjury, the state could access many more records. Right now, he is probably clear on perjury because his initial answers were evasive, he could claim faulty memory/[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics