Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Dr. Glaucomflencken take on the newest surgeon general nomination"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Trump’s first Surgion General’s criticism gets even more pointed: [i]Many of my Republican colleagues champion “merit” - meeting basic standards for a job. The Surgeon General MUST be a member of the USPHS Commissioned Corps. To serve as a physician in the Corps, you MUST hold an active medical license. I -and every prior SG- was held to that standard. If the administration lowers (or creates a back door around) those standards, and the Senate confirms Casey Means (who has let her license go inactive and didn't complete residency), they undermine every argument they've made about merit, standards, and opposing “DEI” shortcuts. 🤷🏽♂️[/i][/quote] Adams might as well be shouting into the wind. [/quote] [twitter]https://x.com/benmazer/status/2027076146123137071?s=46&t=kf1qYlCXQnKgUhJWEIu2vg[/twitter][/quote] I have met Dr. Adams during his tenure as SG and he is a decent man who was very committed to his role. It’s unfortunate to see him mud wrestling with these pigs. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics