Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Beauty and Fashion
Reply to "NY Times view on long hair"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I cannot believe the NYT referenced the musical Hair - which debuted in 1967, FIFTY EIGHT YEARS ago - as the reason why long hair is more popular now. I think they could have said some things that edge toward the political, as posters have done, to describe the styles now. Or looked at Hair as part of the broader counter culture movement, and how mores have continued to change in the past 60 years, but the way they used the reference was ridiculous. Thinking about the women we see everyday (or used to) - newscasters like Jane Pauley, Diane Sawyer, Katie Couric who have been replaced by the Fox News look. It is interesting that Melania is the first First Lady to have hair below her shoulders. [/quote] That’s the only interesting thing there. The rest is usually plagiarized. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
