Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Basketball
Reply to "Arlington travel tryouts?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]For boys typically they do 2 nights and the 3rd night is for those who made the initial cut. Roster decisions are determined by the following Saturday. There are no other places for Arlington kids to go so they don’t have to worry about poaching. That scheduled holds true yearly for 5th grade. After 5th they play the 3rd night by ear. One year they may only do 2 nights or they may opt to do the initial cut and hold a 3rd night for a smaller group.[/quote] its intersting how different the dynamics are for places where the kids have no other choices vs. the places where the coaches are haveing to compete for players. last year my ds coach sent some invites out the night after tryout 1 to try and lock in some players. and the coaches try to do their first tryout the very first night.[/quote] Correct. Arlington (and I think Gainsville) has numerous restrictions placed on it to participate in the Fairfax league that all the other youth teams do not. Whether those restrictions would stand up to litigation would certainly be an interesting outcome.[/quote] Litigation :lol: . Its a private sports league, they can run it how they choose. [/quote] NCAA is a private sports league, they can run it how they choose. ..must why the NCAA has been so successful beating off all that litigation recently. There is an argument the FYBLL is restraining the ability of consumers (i.e. youth basketball players) to participate and play basketball for what organization they want via restrictions on who a player can play for and who they can't. (E.g. the zip code rule and Arlingtons conplete ban). The argument in support of this is to prevent recruiting and I guess Arlingtons numbers to swamp other local organizations. Any type of restrictions on consumer choice is generally anti-competitive. Whether it rises to a restraint of trade and antitrust is up for debate. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics