Reply to She picked Tim

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "She picked Tim"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If it was up to JD Vance, I wouldn't have a family because of IVF.
Walz:

“Democrats are investing in prenatal care. We're the ones that are for universal pre-K. We're the ones that are providing school meals. I'm not gonna back down one bit on this whole family values thing. We're making it more affordable to have children by having paid family and medical leave. Where is JD Vance's program?”

Damned straight, Tim.  This is why people like him & not the that freak, Vance. [/quote]

The fed gov is supposed to be protecting our borders and funding and training our military. That’s its number one priority. 
[/quote]

How about we do both? It's not a small government.[/quote]

We don’t have the money to do both. The constitution says nothing about funding or investing in pre-k.

One in three families can’t afford basic school supplies for their kids. The economy stinks on ice. Why should the government take tax dollars to fund pre-k when taxpayers can’t afford school supplies?

The government has no mandate to fund so many things they are funding. Whatever personal challenges Walz or any other government official has faced, it’s their personal issue. Every single American has personal struggles and issues. The government should not be the answer to these personal issues and cannot be. The government cannot legislate personal issues. [b]Walz is not speaking about the issues government has a duty to address; he’s speaking about his private fertility issues and those have no intersection with government. [/b]
[/quote]

Dobbs had a helluva lot to do with a lot of people's reproductive decisions. Did you want people to be ashamed and afraid to talk about what impact federal legal decisions are having on their real, lived lives in that setting as well? [/quote]

The United States is made up of more than women of childbearing age who want to kill their unborn babies. There is absolutely nothing in the Constitution regarding abortion. [/quote]

There's certainly something about restrictions on interstate commerce, and the GOP is salivating on preventing women from trvelling across state lines to get necessary health care. That's your creepy VP Vance, right here: a "federal response to keep that from happening ... I'm pretty sympathetic to that, actually."

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZO1olV1Mto[/youtube][/quote]

The Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision.[/quote]

The Constitution makes no specific reference to AR-15s with high capacity magazines, pistol grips, flash suppressors and bayonet mounts so why are those protected by the 2nd Amendment?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics