Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "She picked Tim"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If it was up to JD Vance, I wouldn't have a family because of IVF. Walz: “Democrats are investing in prenatal care. We're the ones that are for universal pre-K. We're the ones that are providing school meals. I'm not gonna back down one bit on this whole family values thing. We're making it more affordable to have children by having paid family and medical leave. Where is JD Vance's program?” Damned straight, Tim. This is why people like him & not the that freak, Vance. [/quote] The fed gov is supposed to be protecting our borders and funding and training our military. That’s its number one priority. [/quote] How about we do both? It's not a small government.[/quote] We don’t have the money to do both. The constitution says nothing about funding or investing in pre-k. One in three families can’t afford basic school supplies for their kids. The economy stinks on ice. Why should the government take tax dollars to fund pre-k when taxpayers can’t afford school supplies? The government has no mandate to fund so many things they are funding. Whatever personal challenges Walz or any other government official has faced, it’s their personal issue. Every single American has personal struggles and issues. The government should not be the answer to these personal issues and cannot be. The government cannot legislate personal issues. [b]Walz is not speaking about the issues government has a duty to address; he’s speaking about his private fertility issues and those have no intersection with government. [/b] [/quote] Alabama Supreme Court said differently. Idaho is going after a banning of IVF. Project 2025, heritage foundation and JD Vance, all strong Donald supporters have vowed to go after a federal ban of abortion, followed by IVF and birth control. [/quote] Trump himself has said he does not want to ban abortion and he fully supports IVF. [/quote] Trump himself has also said he supports a 15 week ban. Vance— VP to an elderly man with an unhealthy lifestyle— is even worse. Federal response to women seeking healthcare out of state. [/quote] I do not think it is legally possible to prevent a woman from traveling for healthcare. People go to out of state specialists all the time. [/quote] Well JD Vance disagrees with you. He said there would need to be a federal response if women went out of state to seek abortions in places where it remained legal. This guy is one KFC from the presidency. [/quote] Is it possible to share a link? I have not seen this reported in MSM. [/quote] DP, but here you go: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/26/jd-vance-abortion-ban-travel[/quote] Thanks for the link! He is saying he is against targeting large numbers of minority women to be sent out of state for abortions. Who would think targeting one group for abortions is ever a good idea? [/quote] Why would that be a FEDERAL response? What's the justification for that to happen in the Constitution, rather than a state issue?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics