Reply to GA Case

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "GA Case"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]As someone who practiced law for many years in the DMV area, I am genuinely curious as to to what if any prior/advance information and knowledge other assistant DAs, other special prosecutors and attorneys representing Fani/Wade/DA's office have/had when they filed various pleadings (some w/ affidavits and other exhibits that may be false) and made assertions and arguments (in good faith one assumes) in Court that were false.

In the DMV area, any attorney who knowingly makes false representation or knowingly submitted any court pleadings (any filings) with false information would be 100% suspended or even disbarred.

Any other attorneys here think anything would happen to the OTHER attorneys (ADAs, SPs, Attorneys for Fani/Wade etc. other than Fani/Wade) who engaged in the above described conduct assuming the allegations are true?

[/quote]

I'd like to get attorneys' take on the precedent being set that any time a prosecutor, judge or any other person sets a foot in a courtroom that they should then be subject to a deep and intense scrutiny of their personal relationships and finances and be subjected to a massive fishing expedition just to satisfy someone's political whims.

That is after all exactly what is happening here.   And if it's fair to do it to Fani Willis, where does it end?[/quote]

I would also like to get an attorney's take on a DA hiring someone she is sleeping with as a special prosecutor, despite the fact that he has no experience in the area in which he is hired, then paying him nearly $700,000 of tax payer's money, from which she benefited when he took her on 5 trips within a few months' period.  
I would also like to know if any attorney has taken 5 luxury trips in a 6 month period.  [/quote]

She tried to hire other attorneys but they were all too chicken to agree.  He was the best she could get.

Think about that.  Would you agree to be a special prosecutor prosecuting the former and possibly future president of a crime?  If not, should you be throwing stones?[/quote]

[b]If I were brave enough to take this case on[/b], I would hope I'd be smart enough to conduct myself in a way that is above reproach. I certainly wouldn't be making the choices she made, which reflect very poor judgment.[/quote]

Sure doesn't sound like you would be...[/quote]

PP here. I'm not an attorney. Supposedly, she was brave enough to take on this case. The importance of this case requires a prosecutor who can use good judgment and make decisions that are above reproach. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics