Reply to Tourist submersible missing on visit to Titanic

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Tourist submersible missing on visit to Titanic"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Titan submersibles released an official suspension of operations today, no further comment.

Let the lawsuits commence.[/quote]

The entity is formed offshore and with all the legal liability protections they could dream up. I’m not sure the damages juice is worth the law firm squeeze. [/quote]

That waiver probably won't hold up in court. [/quote]

Why wouldn’t it hold up? These were highly sophisticated actors. They were fully briefed on the risks of diving on an experimental unregulated submersible and chose to assume them anyway. The best they could claim is there was some fraud. But I fully believe Rush was high on his own supply so there was no intent to deceive. [/quote]

The father and son weren't sophisticated actors. Unclear if  They were just tourists. And waivers like that rarely hold up in court, especially when negligence is involved. The fact that the CEO didn't care about his own life is neither here nor there.

The company's executives have a rough ride ahead. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics