Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Pelosi announces impeachment inquiry"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This is what the Ukraine/Impeachment story is about https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/1193576528552091648 And if anyone wants to say Seth Abramson is just a conspiracy theorist, then please tell where his facts are wrong and not just discount the thread because you don't like it.[/quote] Won't give him the attention he craves. Not going to read his drivel. He has a propensity for writing totally unverified theories - so to say his facts are wrong are impossible because they have never been proven or disproven. They are nutty theories. As for Abramson's reputations as a conspiracy theorist.... Here, the WaPo lumps him in with Mensch and Eric Garland - both known to be conspiracy theorists. [quote]Recent news also disconfirms the already legally confused 2017 proclamation from Seth Abramson, author of the book “Proof of Collusion,” that “Bob Mueller will hunt both Trump and Pence to the ends of the Earth to secure impeachment and conviction.”[/quote] [quote] Abramson, meanwhile, seemed to insist Sunday that Mueller’s conclusions about “collusion” are irrelevant because, confusingly, “Mueller never investigated the collusion allegation Trump was facing.” [/quote] https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/03/26/mueller-report-is-get-ready-conspiracy-theories/ Here, the WaPo gets into how he has garnered a following, despite his specious claims and connections.... [quote]There are, to be sure, many leaps in his analysis. Abramson’s tweets link copiously to sources, but they range in quality from investigative news articles to off-the-wall Facebook posts and tweets from Tom Arnold. The New Republic and Atlantic have both dismissed the professor as a conspiracy theorist.[/quote] https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2017/12/06/people-cant-stop-reading-a-professors-theory-of-a-trump-russia-conspiracy-true-or-not/ And, even Mother Jones recognizes his opportunism. [quote]The Trump era has been a bonanza for investigative journalism and Democratic fundraising. But it’s also inspired a host of opportunists who have capitalized on fears about Trump to hawk their own podcasts, premium Twitter accounts, and books (for children and adults). Here are a few leading lights:[/quote] https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2019/07/a-quick-guide-to-whos-making-money-off-trump-paranoia/ Bottom line... If you are reading Abramson or giving him any credibility, you are easily duped. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics