Reply to Ethics of adoption

Forum Index » Parenting -- Special Concerns

Reply to "Ethics of adoption"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I read it.  I found it to be pretty one-sided.  I think changing the waiting period for adoption revocation is a terrible idea, and ignores the needs of the child.  A baby needs to immediately bond with its parent- whether that is the birth parent or an adoptive parent- not be ping-ponged back and forth.
The article did not make any attempt to get alternate perspectives- it only looked at those who regretted adoption.[/quote]

The fetus has already bonded in utero and studies have shown the baby suffers when birth mother and baby are separated.  [/b]Women who have babies born out of wedlock are no longer ostracized[b] and society should do all it can to keep these women and their babies together.  It is not the job of any woman to be a brood mare for infertile couples.  Adopting children from other countries is a travesty because these babies will never know or understand their hereditary culture, extended families or their mother tongue.[/quote]

Tell that to Bristol Palin.[/quote]

Bristol Palin is a fool but So are all women who choose to have a child without a committed partner.  Nevertheless, she may have apologized but she is open about it and not hanging her head on shame.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics