Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Schools and Education General Discussion
Reply to "How Common Core is wrecking kindergartner -- with SPECIFIC examples"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] If the intent of the standards were aspirational goals for students, they make some sense. As to whether they are developmentally appropriate, surely it ought to be possible to do a controlled study. The actual standards development process doesn't seem to have done one, though. [/quote] The intent of the standards to be the learning goals for what students should know and be able to do at each grade level. Is that what you mean by "aspirational goal"? I agree that it is theoretically possible to do a controlled study. What aim would you be trying to accomplish with this controlled study? If it turned out that the standards (K-2? K-6? K-12?) were developmentally appropriate, then what? If it turned out that some or all of the standards were not developmentally appropriate, then what? Which non-Common-Core standards in education have undergone testing via a controlled study to determine whether they are developmentally appropriate?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
