Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Trying to understand Nicola Peltz Beckham "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I guess Victoria owns the trademark to "Brooklyn Beckham" (and all her kids), and it was due to expire. It doesn't sound quite so nefarious, "Brand and Culture expert Nick Ede added: 'Situations like this are far more common than people realise in high-profile families but they’re usually handled privately, not in the public eye or as explosively as this one 'The Beckham brand has always been both a family and a business. When a name becomes a global commercial asset, legal protections and trademarks are often put in place early on to safeguard future opportunities and avoid third-party exploitation. Where this becomes emotionally charged is timing and perception. If a conversation around contracts or trademarks happens during a deeply personal moment like a wedding, it can understandably feel overwhelming or misinterpreted particularly if different advisers are giving different interpretations. 'What may be intended as protection can feel like pressure when trust and communication break down which this certainly feels like it is. 'It’s also important to stress that trademark ownership doesn’t equal control over someone’s life or identity it’s about commercial usage in specific categories. These arrangements are usually designed to future-proof the family rather than restrict individual freedom."[/quote] Just going to send this. That's wrong on her part. He's 26 now and she doesn't need to be owner of it anymore [/quote] Absolutely. Having the ownership under 18 makes complete sense. He got married in his early 20s. At that point his parents should not be pressuring him to continue to allow them to own his name/brand.[/quote] Victoria should absolutely assign ownership of the trademark to BB. It’s HIS name. At the same time, there’s no brand there… he hasn’t done anything with that trademark. And didn’t he change his name to include PeltzThey in his last name? So the trademark is sort of dead anyway…[/quote] they probably figure it is better to hold on to them in case one of his projects pop off. That way they'll have some stake in it[/quote] And why shouldn't they? There's nothing stopping him from creating his own brand from the ground up that has nothing to do with his family name, which everyone associates with David and Victoria?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics