Reply to Second round options for Woodward boundary study

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Second round options for Woodward boundary study "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Option D seems best from a utilization standpoint with minimal FARMS increases to existing schools (~6.5% increase to Einstein - but that’s the school with the biggest FARMS increase under all options and the increase is higher than 6.5% in other options). Option D has a lot of split articulation but - to an extent all options have this and as noted above it sounds like elementary schools will need to be assessed next. Since we’re trying to ensure utilization of space while not having crazy transportation costs Option D seems the best to this DCC parent but am I missing anything?[/quote]

Out of these 4 yes, I like Option D the most for the reasons you described. For our kid they are all the same so don't feel strongly on a personal level.

However, on the utilization piece this does assume an added 500 seats at Wheaton which I'd like for them to explain more. Right now it feels like they are playing fast and loose with the capacity for Wheaton in order to make things easier on themselves now. Then later when it's all said and done they will suddenly need more money to create all those seats that weren't available for the first round of options.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics