Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Jury refuses to indict Sandwich Man and other Trump cop misadventures"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I think it's funny everyone thinks J6 is relevant. Do you believe the Subway Assaulter will be allowed to introduce evidence of J6, and the judge will acquit? [/quote] DCUM isn’t a court of law. Posters are allowed to take the entirety of Trump’s and his minions’ actions into account when forming their opinions on this administration’s policies, the motives behind them, their implementation, and the end results. We can appreciate the context of this month’s events.[/quote] OK but if you are fired from a government job you need evidence for MSPB. You are not going to win your termination case by pointing out posts on DCUM. So your argument about other Trump supporters at DOJ does not help the terminated employee in any way. [/quote] Is this an MSPB hearing?[/quote] No. The point is the lack of indictment does nothing positive for the person's employment case. [/quote] Is this about his employment case? No it is not. Although if I was his lawyer I would absolutely use the fact that Wise is employed at DOJ to challenge the action.[/quote] Having the DOJ on your resume during this time period is probably a red flag, anyway. Best to move on if you want to he taken seriously later, and he’s a young guy.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics