Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "What does it take to get a little gun control "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] We would be better off spending a lot of 100 billion for this ridiculous mass deportation program on a buyback program. That is a legitimate opinion and I think we would all get a lot more out of it.[/quote] And the funds would go to a lot of American families instead of a bunch of billionaires in the prison industry.[/quote] If we deport the illegals, Americans can be a cohesive group again and work to enact policies to support Americans. The only people who win with mass immigration are the billionaires. It's something the right and left should agree on. [/quote] What are you smoking? We're not a cohesive group. We never have been. We are not now and we never will be. Obviously we have differences only. We settle them by voting. I think we should have a constitutional right to abortion. That got voted away from me and if I want it changed I have to change the vote.[/quote] We never had a constitutional right to abortion. We had an activist court create it out of thin air. Look, I think every woman should have access to abortion for free, all subsidized by the government. But I can read the Constitution and see there's no such right in it. [/quote] Activist courts in the 1980s through the 2000s also created the modern interpretation of the second amendment out of thin air (funded by the NRA). Prior to 1970, the 2A was largely ignored, and understood to be rooted in mistrust of a standing army and therefore applicable only to militias. James Madison’s first draft of the amendment explicitly stated: “a well armed and well regulated militia being the best security of a free country: but no person religiously scrupulous of bearing arms shall be compelled to render military service in person.” Note the religious exemption clause, which doesn’t make sense if you’re talking about personal self defense. The phrases “well-regulated” and “militia” imply that the state has a right to regulate firearms. If you want to be a strict originalist, go right ahead, but you can’t have it both ways.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics